All cases

Filters

1308 Cases


  • UKSC/2024/0086

    Case summary:

    Can Hotel La Tour Ltd, the representative company of the Hotel La Tour Group which carries on the taxable business of providing hotel accommodation, recover input tax incurred in connection with a sale of shares in its managed subsidiary, Hotel La Tour Birmingham Ltd?

    Last updated: 5 June 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0109

    Case summary:

    When considering whether extradition pursuant to a conviction warrant is a proportionate interference with the requested person’s right to respect for their private and family life under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”), what is the relevance of the possibility of early release in the requesting State?

    Last updated: 5 June 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0071

    Case summary:

    Was the Court of Appeal correct to dismiss the Appellant’s application?

    Last updated: 5 June 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0064

    Case summary:

    Did the Inner House err in repelling the appellant’s objection to the Auditor of Court’s assessment of the respondent’s expenses?

    Last updated: 4 June 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0059

    Case summary:

    (1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)?

    Linked cases

    Last updated: 4 June 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0074

    Case summary:

    Did the first respondents correctly construe and apply the order in which the impacts of a development should be considered and addressed within policy 3(b)(iii) of National Planning Framework 4 (“NPF4”) when they granted consent for the construction of a wind farm?

    Last updated: 4 June 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0079

    Case summary:

    (1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)

    Linked cases

    Last updated: 4 June 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0093

    Case summary:

    Last updated: 4 June 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0066

    Judgment given
    Case summary:

    What is the test for determining if a lender has constructive notice (and is, therefore, put on inquiry) that one party in a non-commercial relationship is being unduly influenced to enter a loan with their partner that will, in part, be used to benefit only their partner?

    Last updated: 4 June 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0092


    Case summary:

    Last updated: 30 May 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0091


    Case summary:

    Last updated: 30 May 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0073

    Case summary:

    Should the Appellant have been treated as an overstayer at the time he applied for leave to remain as a skilled worker?

    Last updated: 30 May 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0116

    Case summary:

    Does the Appellant’s case against the Respondent under section 2 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 satisfy the first stage of the test for vicarious liability?

    Last updated: 29 May 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0083

    Case summary:

    (1) What is the correct approach to reviewing the decision of an inferior court or tribunal that has purported to disagree with the assessment of national security issues by the responsible Minister? (2) Were cogent (or any) reasons provided in this case sufficient to render lawful the proposed departure from the Minister’s assessment? (3) Does procedural fairness require a coroner proposing to provide a gist of sensitive information, over which public-interest immunity has been asserted in a Ministerial Certificate, to give the relevant Minster an opportunity to make representations and submissions on the proposed gist before the decision is made to release it? (4) Did the coroner here act ultra vires, Wednesbury irrationally and/or fail to take into account a material consideration when she ordered disclosure of a gist / information damaging to national security when the inquest could never be completed by operation of statute?

    Last updated: 29 May 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0122

    Case summary:

    (1) Does section 850 of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (“ITTOIA”) apply to profits retained by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership and subsequently reallocated to individual members of that partnership pursuant to an incentivisation and deferral arrangement? (2) If the answer to (1) is no, are the profits allocated by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership to its individual members under an incentivisation and deferral arrangement chargeable income tax, either (A) as miscellaneous income under section 687 ITTOIA; or (B) as sales of occupation income under the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”)?

    Linked cases

    Last updated: 29 May 2025


Sign up for case email alerts

Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.