Visit JCPCAll cases
1327 Cases
UKSC/2025/0101
•
INSOLVENCY
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Whether a restructuring plan which satisfied all the jurisdictional requirements of Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 should nevertheless have been declined sanction by the court on the basis that the ‘public interest’ would be better served by the entry of Thames Water Utilities Limited into a special administration regime, notwithstanding that this view was not shared by the Secretary of State or OfWat.
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0081
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Appeal issuedCase summary:In what circumstances can a party to a contract recover damages for a breach of that contract in respect of losses that were sustained not by the contracting party itself but by its subsidiary?
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0112
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0106
•
COMMERCIAL
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Following the Appellants’ breach of contract, was the Respondents’ proper remedy in damages or in debt?
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0096
•
CRIME
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Are the sentences imposed on the Appellants a disproportionate interference with their rights under Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)?
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0083
•
INSOLVENCY
Case summary:Does the Appellant have standing to bring proceedings that raise issues that are in substance a challenge to decisions made in separate proceedings between the Respondent and the Appellant’s father?
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0074
•
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the first respondents correctly construe and apply the order in which the impacts of a development should be considered and addressed within policy 3(b)(iii) of National Planning Framework 4 (“NPF4”) when they granted consent for the construction of a wind farm?
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0059
•
CRIME
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:(1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)?
Linked casesLegal Issue
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0079
•
CRIME
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:(1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)
Linked casesLegal Issue
Last updated: 10 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0110
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 9 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0117
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:When, if ever, should a court make an award of costs in a foreign currency?
Last updated: 9 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0064
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Inner House err in repelling the appellant’s objection to the Auditor of Court’s assessment of the respondent’s expenses?
Last updated: 8 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0069
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Whether expenditure incurred on studies used to inform the development of wind farms falls within the scope of “qualifying expenditure” for the purposes of the Capital Allowances Act 2001.
Last updated: 8 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0071
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal correct to dismiss the Appellant’s application?
Last updated: 8 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0065
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the High Court’s finding that the Respondent had a legitimate expectation to be consulted in respect of policies issued by the Appellant concerning immigration detention, arrangements of healthcare and safeguarding of detained people?
Last updated: 8 July 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.