Skip to main content

Permission to Appeal

Permission to Appeal - February 2022

Permission to Appeal results - February 2022
Case Name Justices PTA Reasons given
R (on the application of Richards) (AP) (Appellant) v Environment Agency and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2022/0014
Neutral Citation Number [2022] EWCA Civ 26
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Stephens
Refused
1 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law in the context of this case.
In the matter of an application by JR83 for Judicial Review No 2 (AP) (Northern Ireland)
UKSC 2021/0221
No Neutral Citation Number
Lord Hodge
Lord Stephens
Lady Rose
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
Amil (Appellant) v Lafferty (Respondent) (Scotlad)
UKSC 2021/0217
Neutral Citation Number [2021] CSIH 41
Van Overwaele (Appellant) v Lafferty (Respondent) (Scotland)
UKSC 2021/0224
Neutral Citation Number [2021] CSIH 41
Lord Hodge
Lord Stephens
Lady Rose
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the applications do not raise an arguable point of law.
McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) (Appellant) v Glasgow City Council (Respondent) (Scotland)
UKSC 2021/0028
Neutral Citation Number [2020] CSIH 51
Lord Hodge
Lord Stephens
Lady Rose
Granted
15 February 2022
 
In the matter of an application by Kielan Allen for Judicial Review (AP) (Northern Ireland)
UKSC 2021/0032
Neutral Citation Number [2020] NICA 40
Lord Hodge
Lord Stephens
Lady Rose
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
Paul Newman New Homes Ltd (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0039
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 15
Lord Hodge
Lord Stephens
Lady Rose
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal.
R (on the application of Monkhill Ltd) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0041
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 74
Lord Hodge
Lord Stephens
Lady Rose
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal.
Gladman Developments Ltd (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and others (Respondents)
UKSC 2021/0058
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 104
Lord Hodge
Lord Stephens
Lady Rose
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal.
Flother (Appellant) v Etihad Airways PJSC (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0024
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1707
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
R (on the application of RJG) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2017/0117
Neutral Citation Number [2016] EWCA Civ 1042
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. This permission to appeal was adjourned pending the outcome of KO (Nigeria), but that decision does not make it appropriate to give permission to appeal in this case.
Taj (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0043
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 19
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
R (on the application of Badmus and others) (AP) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0048
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 657
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
Buttar Construction Ltd (Appellant) v Arshdeep (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0197
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 1408
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
Bojarinovs (Appellant) v General Prosecutors Office, Latvia (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0053
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWHC 374
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
O'Neill (Respondent) v Holland (Appellant)
UKSC 2021/0037
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1583
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) (Respondent) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd (Appellant)
UKSC 2021/0027
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1521
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Leggatt
Granted in part
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused on Ground 2 (amending Defence).
Libyan Investment Authority and others (Respondents) v King and others (Appellants)
UKSC 2021/0021
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1690
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Leggatt
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
Kuwait Oil Company (K.S.C.) (Appellant) v Al-Tarkait (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0025
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1752
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Leggatt
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Appellant) v BTI 2014 LLC (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0035
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 9
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Leggatt
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
R (on the application of Day) (Appellant) v Shropshire Council (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0031
Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1751
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Leggatt
Granted
15 February 2022
 
Rossiter (Appellant) v Partington (As Executor) (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0218
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 1564
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Leggatt
Refused
15 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0047
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 91
Lord Reed
Lord Hamblen
Lord Stephens
Granted
23 February 2022
 
R (on the application of Maguire) (AP) (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2021/0038
Lord Reed
Lord Hamblen
Lord Stephens
Granted
23 February 2022
 
R (on the application of CXF, by his litigation friend MB) (Appellant) v Central Bedfordshire Council (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0026
Neutral Citation Number [2018] EWCA Civ 2852
Lord Reed
Lord Hamblen
Lord Stephens
Refused
23 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd and another (Respondents) v Motorola Solutions Inc and another (Appellants)
UKSC 2021/0036
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 11
Lord Reed
Lord Hamblen
Lord Stephens
Refused
23 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise a point which ought to be considered at this time. Although there may be an arguable point in relation to the test of “a good arguable case”, there is no arguable point in relation to impropriety, and an appeal would therefore be bound to fail.
R (on the application of Asda Stores Ltd) (Appellant) v Leeds City Council and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2021/0054
Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 32
Lord Reed
Lord Hamblen
Lord Stephens
Refused
23 February 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
Prior and another (AP) (Appellants) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland)
UKSC 2021/0030
Neutral Citation Number [2020] CSIH 36
Lord Reed
Lord Hamblen
Lord Stephens
Refused
1 March 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.