All cases
1155 Cases
UKSC/2023/0034
•
INSOLVENCY
Hearing listedCase summary:Where a claimant company has been struck off and then subsequently restored to the register of companies, what is required for the limitation period to be extended (pursuant to Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980) on the basis that it could not with reasonable diligence have discovered a fraud during the period it was dissolved?
Linked casesLast updated: 13 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0033
•
INSOLVENCY
Hearing listedCase summary:UKSC 2023/0033: Is it possible to make a person liable as a party to the carrying on of a business for fraudulent purposes (under Section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986) if they did not exercise management or control of the company in question? UKSC 2023/0034: Where a claimant company has been struck off and then subsequently restored to the register of companies, what is required for the limitation period to be extended (pursuant to Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980) on the basis that it could not with reasonable diligence have discovered a fraud during the period it was dissolved?
Linked casesLast updated: 13 December 2024
UKSC/2024/1008
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 13 December 2024
UKSC/2024/1007
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 12 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0043
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment givenCase summary:Does an agreement to transfer the beneficial interest in shares in a private company to the legal owner of those shares need to be in writing and signed by each of those making the disposal?
Linked casesLast updated: 11 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0044
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment givenCase summary:Does an agreement to transfer the beneficial interest in shares in a private company to the legal owner of those shares need to be in writing and signed by each of those making the disposal?
Linked casesLegal issue
Last updated: 11 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0077
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment givenCase summary:Can the Public and Commercial Services Union ("PCS") enforce a contractual term offering the facility for "check-off arrangements", whereby employees' trade union subscriptions are deducted directly from their salaries through the payroll system and then paid to PCS, pursuant to section 1 of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?
Linked casesLast updated: 11 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0075
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment givenCase summary:Can the Public and Commercial Services Union ("PCS") enforce a contractual term offering the facility for "check-off arrangements", whereby employees' trade union subscriptions are deducted directly from their salaries through the payroll system and then paid to PCS, pursuant to section 1 of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?
Linked casesLast updated: 11 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0076
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment givenCase summary:Can the Public and Commercial Services Union ("PCS") enforce a contractual term offering the facility for "check-off arrangements", whereby employees' trade union subscriptions are deducted directly from their salaries through the payroll system and then paid to PCS, pursuant to section 1 of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?
Linked casesLast updated: 11 December 2024
UKSC/2024/1006
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 10 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0110
•
NEGLIGENCE
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:This appeal concerns how liability is allocated in circumstances where, as a result of allegedly negligent work undertaken by a consultant (the appellant), a property developer (the respondent) carries out remedial work on properties it no longer owns and in respect of defects for which it cannot be held liable due to the expiry of applicable limitation periods. Specifically, the appeal raises the following questions: 1. In the circumstances set out above, has the respondent suffered actionable and recoverable damage that falls within the duty of care owed to it by the appellant? 2. Do the retrospective extended limitation periods provided for by section 135 of the Building Safety Act 2022 apply (i) in the circumstances set out above, and (ii) to claims brought before section 135 came into force and are the subject of pending proceedings? 3. Does section 1(1)(a) of the Defective Premises Act 1972 apply only to purchasers of properties, or does it also apply to commercial developers? 4. Is the respondent entitled to bring a contribution claim against the appellant under section 1 of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 notwithstanding that (i) there has been no judgment or settlement between the respondent and any third party, and (ii) no third party has asserted any claim against the respondent?
Last updated: 5 December 2024
UKSC/2024/1005
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 5 December 2024
UKSC/2024/1004
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 4 December 2024
UKSC/2021/0181
•
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Judgment givenCase summary:(1) What is the test for determining "bad faith" in s.3(6) of the Trade Marks Act 1994? (2) If such bad faith is found, what is the correct approach to determining the specification that the proprietor of the trademark should be permitted to retain?
Last updated: 3 December 2024
UKSC/2023/0085
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether the one-year time limit in Article III, rule 6 of the Hague Visby Rules applies to claims for mis-delivery of cargo after discharge of the cargo from the vessel.
Last updated: 3 December 2024
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.