Visit JCPCAll cases
1486 Cases
UKSC/2022/0133
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that Tesco was entitled to terminate certain employment contracts which included an entitlement to "Retained Pay", described as "permanent", and offer re-engagement on terms without Retained Pay (the so-called "fire and re-hire" mechanism)?
Last updated: 27 April 2026
UKSC/2024/0015
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:Are the courts of England and Wales the proper place for UniCredit to bring its claim for an anti-suit injunction against RusChemAlliance, or should the claim have been brought in France? Are the arbitration agreements between the parties governed by French law or English law?
Last updated: 27 April 2026
UKSC/2023/0053
•
FAMILY
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal right, in balancing the respective article 8 and article 10 rights, to discharge the relevant Reporting Restriction Orders?
Linked casesLast updated: 27 April 2026
UKSC/2023/0052
•
FAMILY
Judgment givenCase summary:On what basis can injunctions, granted in connection with proceedings initiated to determine whether it is in a child’s best interests that life-sustaining treatment should be withdrawn, be continued once those proceedings have ended?
Linked casesLegal issue
Last updated: 27 April 2026
UKSC/2026/0052
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 27 April 2026
UKSC/2025/0058
•
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Hearing in progressCase summary:Do the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to determine disputes as to what licence terms are fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory at the request of an implementor rather than a patent owner, where the licence is offered by an intermediary as part of a pool or platform of patents?
Linked casesLast updated: 27 April 2026
UKSC/2026/0039
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Appeal issuedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in finding that the conditions of CHK’s immigration bail do not constitute a sufficient restraint on his liberty to justify a writ of habeas corpus? Did the Court of Appeal err in ordering CHK to pay the respondent’s costs?
Last updated: 24 April 2026
UKSC/2026/0037
•
TORT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Can the tort of unlawful means conspiracy be founded on: 1. a civil wrong that is not independently actionable by the claimant? 2. a breach of contract to which the claimant is not a party? 3. a breach of foreign law? 4. conduct that the defendant did not know to be unlawful?
Linked casesRelated case
Last updated: 24 April 2026
UKSC/2026/0034
•
TORT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Can the tort of unlawful means conspiracy be founded on: 1. a civil wrong that is not independently actionable by the claimant? 2. a breach of contract to which the claimant is not a party? 3. a breach of foreign law? 4. conduct that the defendant did not know to be unlawful?
Linked casesPrimary Case
Primary Case
Last updated: 24 April 2026
UKSC/2026/0035
•
TORT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Can the tort of unlawful means conspiracy be founded on: 1. a civil wrong that is not independently actionable by the claimant? 2. a breach of contract to which the claimant is not a party? 3. a breach of foreign law? 4. conduct that the defendant did not know to be unlawful?
Linked casesPrimary Case
Last updated: 24 April 2026
UKSC/2021/0189
•
TAX
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether outsourced loan administration services supplied by Target are standard rated supplies for VAT purposes, or if they fall under the "financial services exemption" under article 135(1)(d) of the Principal VAT Directive, implemented in the Value Added Tax Act 1994?
Last updated: 23 April 2026
UKSC/2022/0048
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether a claim in knowing receipt requires a claimant to prove a continuing equitable interest in the property transferred to the defendant in breach of trust, in addition to knowledge on the part of the defendant so as to render his receipt unconscionable.
Last updated: 23 April 2026
UKSC/2021/0212
•
TAX
Judgment givenCase summary:What is the correct construction of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 739 and following of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (and its successor in Chapter 2 of Part 13 of the Income Tax Act 2007)? In particular: i) Does the transfer of assets have to be a transfer by the individual who has the power to enjoy the income that becomes payable to the overseas person? ii) If the individual has to be the transferor of the assets in order for section 739 to apply, in what circumstances (if any) can an individual be treated as a transferor of the assets where the transfer is in fact made by a company in which the individual is a shareholder?
Linked casesCross appeal
Last updated: 23 April 2026
UKSC/2021/0213
•
TAX
Judgment givenCase summary:What is the correct construction of the anti-avoidance provisions in section 739 and following of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (and its successor in Chapter 2 of Part 13 of the Income Tax Act 2007)? In particular: i) Does the transfer of assets have to be a transfer by the individual who has the power to enjoy the income that becomes payable to the overseas person? ii) If the individual has to be the transferor of the assets in order for section 739 to apply, in what circumstances (if any) can an individual be treated as a transferor of the assets where the transfer is in fact made by a company in which the individual is a shareholder?
Linked casesLast updated: 23 April 2026
UKSC/2025/0067
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:Do 'furlough' payments paid by the UK Government under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“CJRS”) to policyholders fall to be deducted from the amounts otherwise payable by insurers in claims for "business interruption" losses suffered because of the Covid-19 pandemic?
Linked casesLast updated: 23 April 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.