Visit JCPCAll cases
1429 Cases
UKSC/2025/0193
•
FAMILY
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Last updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0179
•
FAMILY
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:This case concerns an application for leave to apply for financial relief in England and Wales following a divorce in Russia, under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (the “1984 Act”). The issues to be decided are whether the Court of Appeal was correct to: i) Set aside the High Court’s decision to refuse the wife leave to apply for financial relief under the 1984 Act. ii) Grant the wife leave under the 1984 Act.
Last updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2023/0173
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2023/0174
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2023/0175
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2023/0176
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2023/0177
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2023/0172
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0043
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:(1) Was it procedurally unfair for the Secretary of State for the Home Department to deprive Mr Kolicaj of his British citizenship without affording him an opportunity to make representations? (2) Did the Court of Appeal act in excess of jurisdiction by quashing the deprivation order made against Mr Kolicaj?
Last updated: 18 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0024
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:The principal issue concerns the validity of a civil penalty notice issued by the Secretary of State for the Home Department under section 15 of the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. In view of the requirement under s.15(6)(a) that a notice must “state why the Secretary of State thinks the employer is liable to the penalty”, is the penalty notice invalid if it does not identify which of the grounds in s.15(1) applies (i.e. by specifying the circumstances in which a person subject to immigration control has no right to work)?
Last updated: 17 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0028
•
TAX
Hearing listedCase summary:Are certain members of BlueCrest LLP to be treated as employees for tax purposes?
Last updated: 17 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0069
•
TAX
Hearing listedCase summary:Whether expenditure incurred on studies used to inform the development of wind farms falls within the scope of “qualifying expenditure” for the purposes of the Capital Allowances Act 2001.
Last updated: 17 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0039
•
FAMILY
Hearing listedCase summary:Does a court have jurisdiction to set aside a valid adoption order other than by way of appeal?
Last updated: 17 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0067
•
COMMERCIAL
Hearing listedCase summary:Whether ‘furlough’ payments made under the Government Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme fall to be deducted from the amount payable in insurance claims for business interruption losses suffered by companies as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Linked casesLast updated: 17 December 2025
UKSC/2025/0068
•
COMMERCIAL
Hearing listedCase summary:Whether ‘furlough’ payments made under the Government Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme fall to be deducted from the amount payable in insurance claims for business interruption losses suffered by companies as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Linked casesLast updated: 17 December 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.