Visit JCPCAll cases
1319 Cases
UKSC/2025/0089
•
EMPLOYMENT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by remitting the case to the Employment Appeals Tribunal and failing to protect the Appellant’s human rights?
Last updated: 27 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0054
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:(1) Was a letter serving a gas safety certificate etc a “notice” within the meaning of the tenancy agreement? (2) Is there a common law presumption that a properly addressed letter that is posted is presumed to be received unless the intended recipient can prove the contrary?
Last updated: 27 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0078
•
IMMIGRATION
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in allowing the SSHD’s appeal and remitting the case back to the Upper Tribunal?
Last updated: 26 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0062
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:In circumstances where a person suspected of an offence has been arrested and the police are considering their release on bail, does the victim of the alleged offence have a right to be consulted as to whether bail should be granted and on what conditions, so far as that is reasonably practicable?
Last updated: 26 June 2025
UKSC/2024/0089
•
FAMILY
Judgment scheduledCase summary:When does non-matrimonial property become matrimonial property in the context of financial remedy proceedings, and how should the sharing principle be applied to such property?
Last updated: 26 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0022
•
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 26 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0055
•
COMMERCIAL
Appeal issuedCase summary:(1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to distinguish between a “half secret’” and a “fully secret” commission for the purpose of determining whether the commission should be treated as a bribe that attracts restitutionary liability for the amount of the bribe? (2) Alternatively, if “half secret” commissions are to be treated distinctly from “fully secret” commissions, was the Court of Appeal wrong to apply a test of dishonesty at all and, in any event, a test which is inconsistent with the decision in Hurstanger and which required more than that the commission-payer knew of the existence of a fiduciary relationship?
Linked casesCross Appeal
Last updated: 25 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0050
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Whether a local authority’s duty to house homeless applicants under section 193 of the Housing Act 1996 ends by operation of law or whether the local authority is required to make a decision that the duty has ended.
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0048
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by misunderstanding the requirements of effective judicial protection and adopting an incorrect approach to conforming interpretation?
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0047
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Does the rule preventing the deduction of penalty payments for the purpose of calculating taxable profits encompass payments made to consumers/consumer organisations in settlement of regulatory investigations?
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0007
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Whether the court has the power to vary a suspended order for possession originally made on a discretionary ground for possession by making an unconditional order on a mandatory ground for possession.
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0035
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by (1) failing to ensure procedural fairness, (2) improperly interfering with the Upper Tribunal’s findings of fact, and (3) applying the wrong legal tests for recklessness and dishonesty?
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2024/0032
•
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal right to conclude the trial judge’s conclusion on the similarity of logos was irrational? What approach should the court take when assessing whether trade marks are similar? At what point of time should the confusion of consumers be assessed in a claim for trade mark infringement?
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2024/0016
•
TAX
Judgment givenCase summary:Is a tender support vessel a “relevant asset” within the meaning of the s.356LA of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and therefore subject to certain restrictions on tax deductions?
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0103
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 23 June 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.