All cases
1277 Cases
UKSC/2025/0004
•
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Hearing listedCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to hold that Oatly AB could not validly register POST MILK GENERATION as a trade mark as this was prohibited under Article 78(2) and Part III of Annex VII of EU Regulation 1308/2013?
Last updated: 29 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0078
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 28 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0077
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 28 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0076
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 28 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0075
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 28 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0074
•
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 28 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0073
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 28 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0072
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 25 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0071
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 25 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0070
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 24 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0027
•
EMPLOYMENT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Does the reference to “the activities of trade unions” in Regulation 3(2)(a) of the Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010 (“the Blacklisting Regulations”) include participation in industrial action?
Last updated: 24 April 2025
UKSC/2024/0057
•
CRIME
Judgment scheduledCase summary:The issues in this appeal can be grouped into three questions: (1)As certified by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland, is the interpretation of a defence statement provided under Part 1 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 a question of law for the trial judge? (2)Was the search of the appellant’s property lawful and if not what are the consequences of that unlawfulness? (3)Does the application to the appellant of the sentencing regime provided for by article 15A of the Terorism Act 2002 breach Article 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights?
Linked casesLast updated: 24 April 2025
UKSC/2024/0058
•
CRIME
Judgment scheduledCase summary:The issues in this appeal can be grouped into three questions: (1) As certified by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland, is the interpretation of a defence statement provided under Part 1 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 a question of law for the trial judge? (2) Was the search of the appellant’s property lawful and if not what are the consequences of that unlawfulness? (3) Does the application to the appellant of the sentencing regime provided for by article 15A of the Terorism Act 2002 breach Article 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights?
Linked casesLast updated: 24 April 2025
UKSC/2025/0053
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:What is the correct interpretation of the word “exercise” or “exercised” in a shareholders’ agreement in determining whether the appellant is entitled to exercise multiple or only one call notice to acquire shares
Last updated: 24 April 2025
UKSC/2018/0224
•
PUBLIC LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:(1) Whether statutory authorities, including the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal, have the power or duty to calculate entitlement to housing benefit without making deductions for under-occupancy, so as not to violate a claimant’s rights under the European Convention on Human Rights; (2) if so, the extent to which the payment of discretionary housing payments are relevant to the task of the statutory authorities in calculating entitlement.
Last updated: 24 April 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.