Visit JCPCAll cases
1562 Cases
UKSC/2020/0114
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 14Case summary:When considering what costs to award following an appeal before the Competition Appeal Tribunal from an infringement decision of the Competition and Markets Authority, is there a starting point and if so, what is it? In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful?
Last updated: 30 August 2026
UKSC/2020/0113
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 14Case summary:When considering what costs to award following an appeal before the Competition Appeal Tribunal from an infringement decision of the Competition and Markets Authority, is there a starting point and if so, what is it? In particular, was the Court of Appeal correct to decide that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against a regulator if it has been unsuccessful, except for a good reason, or is the starting point instead that an order for costs should be made against the regulator where it is unsuccessful?
Last updated: 30 August 2026
UKSC/2020/0185
•
DEVOLUTION
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 6Case summary:Does the failure to bring into force certain amendments to the Extradition Act 2003 in Scotland give rise to a breach of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights?
Last updated: 30 August 2026
UKSC/2024/0083
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 47Case summary:What is the correct test to be applied when a court judicially reviews a decision by a coroner to disclose gists of information over which Public Interest Immunity (“PII”) is asserted by a Minister on behalf of the Crown?
Last updated: 30 August 2026
UKSC/2024/0123
•
TAX
Judgment given[2026] UKSC 17Case summary:(1) Does section 850 of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (“ITTOIA”) apply to profits retained by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership and subsequently reallocated to individual members of that partnership pursuant to an incentivisation and deferral arrangement? (2) If the answer to (1) is no, are the profits allocated by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership to its individual members under an incentivisation and deferral arrangement chargeable income tax, either (A) as miscellaneous income under section 687 ITTOIA; or (B) as sales of occupation income under the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”)?
Linked casesLegal issue
Last updated: 30 August 2026
UKSC/2024/0122
•
TAX
Judgment given[2026] UKSC 17Case summary:(1) Does section 850 of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 (“ITTOIA”) apply to profits retained by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership and subsequently reallocated to individual members of that partnership pursuant to an incentivisation and deferral arrangement? (2) If the answer to (1) is no, are the profits allocated by a corporate member of a limited liability partnership to its individual members under an incentivisation and deferral arrangement chargeable income tax, either (A) as miscellaneous income under section 687 ITTOIA; or (B) as sales of occupation income under the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”)?
Linked casesLast updated: 30 August 2026
UKSC/2024/0016
•
TAX
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 24Case summary:Is a tender support vessel a “relevant asset” within the meaning of the s.356LA of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 and therefore subject to certain restrictions on tax deductions?
Last updated: 29 August 2026
UKSC/2024/0032
•
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 25Case summary:Was the Court of Appeal right to conclude the trial judge’s conclusion on the similarity of logos was irrational? What approach should the court take when assessing whether trade marks are similar? At what point of time should the confusion of consumers be assessed in a claim for trade mark infringement?
Last updated: 29 August 2026
UKSC/2020/0206
•
PROCEDURE
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 16Case summary:A. Whether the execution of the Court of Appeal’s judgment and order should be stayed pending the resolution of this application for permission to appeal and, if permission is granted, pending the appeal.B. In the proposed appeal: (i) What is the correct approach to an application to reconsider an order after it has been made, but before it has been sealed, (ii) Whether the Court of Appeal erred by interfering in the judge’s exercise of her discretion in relation to the jurisdiction to reconsider an order, and (iii) Whether FAAN, the applicant seeking reconsideration of the order, required relief from sanctions under the Civil Procedure Rules in circumstances where the relevant order only permitted AIC to apply for enforcement of the arbitral award rather than to enforce it straight away if FAAN failed to comply with the order.
Last updated: 28 August 2026
UKSC/2020/0039
•
BANKING/INSOLVENCY
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 35Case summary:In what circumstances will solicitors have waived (or be inferred to have waived) their equitable lien when a solicitor enters into a security arrangement with a client?
Last updated: 28 August 2026
UKSC/2025/0170
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Judgment given[2026] UKSC 31Case summary:Does the failure to serve a participation notice on a qualifying tenant invalidate a claim notice served by the right to manage company?
Last updated: 28 August 2026
UKSC/2026/0128
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 27 August 2026
UKSC/2026/0127
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 27 August 2026
UKSC/2026/0074
•
FAMILY
Awaiting judgmentCase summary:Can the views of a child be taken into account when considering whether the defence under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Convention”) is made out? Were the Inner House correct to override the Outer House’s decision as to whether the child concerned should be returned?
Linked casesLegal Issue
Last updated: 26 August 2026
UKSC/2026/0080
•
FAMILY
Awaiting judgmentCase summary:Can the views of a child be taken into account when considering whether the defence under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Convention”) is made out? Were the Inner House correct to override the Outer House’s decision as to whether the child concerned should be returned?
Linked casesLegal Issue
Last updated: 26 August 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.