Visit JCPCAll cases
1598 Cases
UKSC/2026/0011
•
TAX
Hearing listedCase summary:When a taxpayer appeals against an HMRC penalty on the basis that the underlying tax claimed is not owed, does the burden rest on the taxpayer to prove that he or she is not liable to pay the underlying tax?
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0143
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Hearing listedCase summary:(1) Is the Information Requirement in Article 2(1)(g)(vi) of the Housing (Tenancy Deposits) (Prescribed Information) Order 2007 (“the 2007 Order”) satisfied where the landlord makes reference to a clause in a tenancy agreement that is not attached and which differs in numbering from the actual tenancy agreement? (2) Is the Confirmation Requirement in Article 2(1)(g)(vii) of the 2007 Order satisfied where the landlord signs a covering letter enclosing the certificate, rather than the certificate itself?
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0099
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:Was the decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to proscribe Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 lawful?
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0012
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:Whether the state is entitled, in light of Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights (“A1P1”), to deprive a person of their possessions in the public interest without paying, or ensuring they recover, market value for those possessions, in circumstances where the policy objective of the deprivation measure is not undermined or diminished by ensuring market value is recovered.
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0039
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in finding that the conditions of CHK’s immigration bail do not constitute a sufficient restraint on his liberty to justify a writ of habeas corpus? Did the Court of Appeal err in ordering CHK to pay the respondent’s costs?
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0157
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Hearing listedCase summary:Does paragraph 9 of Schedule 8 to the Building Safety Act 2022 (“BSA 2022”) preclude the recovery of legal or professional costs by way of service charge from leaseholders holding a qualifying lease where those costs were incurred before the BSA 2022 came into effect?
Linked casesLast updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0156
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Hearing listedCase summary:(1) Did the Court of Appeal take the wrong approach to whether it was ‘just and equitable’ to make a remediation contribution order under s124 Building Safety Act 2022? (2) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to conclude that a remediation contribution order under s124 Building Safety Act 2022 can be made in respect of costs incurred before that provision came into force on 28 June 2022?
Linked casesLast updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0176
•
ARBITRATION
Hearing listedCase summary:Does “control” for the purposes of Article 1(1)(c) of the investment treaty agreed between the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic and the Swiss Confederation dated 5 October 1990 (“BIT”) require that the legal entity be controlled de jure, or is de facto control sufficient? What is the test for “de facto” control for the purposes of Article 1(1)(c) BIT? Did the CA err by holding that CR’s objection to Mr Strava’s claim in respect of breaches of the BIT post-dating the alleged disposal of his interest in the qualifying investments was not an objection to “substantive jurisdiction” under section 30 Arbitration Act 1996? Did the Court of Appeal err by ordering that the full BIT award should be paid to Mr Stava despite finding that Diag Human SE was not a qualifying investor for the purposes of the BIT?
Linked casesLegal Issue
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0034
•
EU LAW
Judgment given[2026] UKSC 36Case summary:Can an arbitral tribunal award equitable compensation against a State for breach of an equitable obligation to arbitrate? Did the Court of Appeal exceed the statutory limits of an appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996?
Linked casesLast updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0100
•
PRIVACY AND INFORMATION
Awaiting hearing dateCase summary:(1) Is the concept of consent in data protection and e-privacy legislation a purely objective one, or does it contain subjective elements? (2) Under what circumstances is it procedurally unfair for the Court of Appeal to determine an issue without seeking or considering submissions from one of the parties on that issue? (3) Under what circumstances can the Court of Appeal remit issues to a different judge than the one who heard the first trial?
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0002
•
ARBITRATION
Hearing listedCase summary:When a time-chartered vessel is redelivered late, by which time the owner is contractually committed to selling the vessel and the sale contracts preclude the owner from chartering it again, are the owners entitled to recover substantial damages assessed by reference to the market rate for the period of the overrun?
Last updated: 29 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0163
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 28 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0091
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Awaiting judgmentCase summary:In summary, did the Court of Appeal err by: (1) Concluding that the ministerial advice was deficient, in a way which failed to apply the correct standard of Wednesbury irrationality; and then not permitting the Appellant to reconsider the decision in light of full and fresh advice from officials addressing the matters identified by the Court of Appeal. (2) Assuming the role of decision-maker in this case and overstepping its constitutional boundaries. (3) Failing to properly consider what is characterised as the ‘floodgates argument’. (4) Taking into account its recent decision in Dillon, despite that decision being subject of an ongoing appeal to the Supreme Court, and the relevant part of the decision being a section 4 Human Rights Act (“HRA”) declaration that did not change the law. (5) Ignoring the scheme for remedial action under the HRA, and or the Appellant’s appeal rights in relation to Dillon. (6) Concluding, in both its consideration of the substantive appeal and in relation to remedy, that this case was an exceptional one that could be distinguished from other similar Troubles related cases. (7) Concluding that the choice faced by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (“SOSNI”), when considering the appropriate investigative mechanism to discharge the Article 2 European Convention of Human Rights (“ECHR”) investigative obligation, was a “binary one” meaning that the only lawful option available was to order a Public Inquiry. (8) Then ordering the mandatory holding of a public inquiry.
Last updated: 28 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0162
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:(1) Is the exercise of the Attorney General’s power to allow or refuse to allow an application to be made for an inquest to be re-opened amenable to Judicial Review? (2) If so, on what grounds may the Attorney General’s exercise of that power be reviewed?
Last updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0062
•
CRIME
Awaiting judgmentCase summary:Were the directions given to the jury by the trial judge in this case right in law? Did the Court of Appeal correctly understand and apply R v Kennedy (No 2) [2007] UKHL 38, and should the Supreme Court reconsider that decision?
Last updated: 27 October 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.