Visit JCPCAll cases
1380 Cases
UKSC/2025/0165
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 12 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0164
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 12 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0047
•
TAX
Hearing listedCase summary:Does the rule preventing the deduction of penalty payments for the purpose of calculating taxable profits encompass payments made to consumers/consumer organisations in settlement of regulatory investigations?
Last updated: 11 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0039
•
FAMILY
Hearing listedCase summary:Does a court have jurisdiction to set aside a valid adoption order other than by way of appeal?
Last updated: 11 September 2025
UKSC/2024/0065
•
TAX
Judgment givenCase summary:Is the effect of section 43 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 that no VAT is chargeable on an intra-group supply of services even where the supplier has left the group by the time consideration for the supply is the subject of a VAT invoice and paid?
Last updated: 11 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0163
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 11 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0162
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 10 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0042
•
DEVOLUTION
Hearing listedCase summary:Does the Minister of Health for Northern Ireland have the power to revise the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Code of Practice (“the Code”) so that persons aged 16 and over who lack capacity to make decisions about their care and treatment can give valid consent to their confinement through the expression of their wishes and feelings?
Last updated: 5 September 2025
UKSC/2024/0158
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:The appeal requires the determination of the following sub-issues: (i) Does, or should, the law recognise a distinct tort of bribery? (ii) If such a tort is recognised, what is the nature of the duty or relationship (here between dealer and customer) that must exist in order for the tort to be engaged? (iii) Relatedly, what level of disclosure will prevent liability for bribery from arising? (iv) In Mr Johnson’s case, was the relationship between customer and lender “unfair” for the purposes of the CCA?
Linked casesLast updated: 3 September 2025
UKSC/2024/0159
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:Does a car dealer who receives a commission from a lender for arranging finance in a tripartite transaction between customer, dealer, and lender in which a car is bought on credit owe a duty to the buyer of the car such as to enable that buyer (absent the requisite level of disclosure) to bring a claim against the lender for bribery or dishonest assistance, or under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the “CCA”)? The appeal requires the determination of the following sub-issues: (i) Does, or should, the law recognise a distinct tort of bribery? (ii) If such a tort is recognised, what is the nature of the duty or relationship (here between dealer and customer) that must exist in order for the tort to be engaged? (iii) Relatedly, what level of disclosure will prevent liability for bribery from arising? (iv) In Mr Johnson’s case, was the relationship between customer and lender “unfair” for the purposes of the CCA?
Linked casesLast updated: 3 September 2025
UKSC/2024/0157
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:Does a car dealer who receives a commission from a lender for arranging finance in a tripartite transaction between customer, dealer, and lender in which a car is bought on credit owe a duty to the buyer of the car such as to enable that buyer (absent the requisite level of disclosure) to bring a claim against the lender for bribery or dishonest assistance, or under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the “CCA”)? The appeal requires the determination of the following sub-issues: (i) Does, or should, the law recognise a distinct tort of bribery? (ii) If such a tort is recognised, what is the nature of the duty or relationship (here between dealer and customer) that must exist in order for the tort to be engaged? (iii) Relatedly, what level of disclosure will prevent liability for bribery from arising? (iv) In Mr Johnson’s case, was the relationship between customer and lender “unfair” for the purposes of the CCA?
Linked casesLast updated: 3 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0141
•
FAMILY
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Last updated: 3 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0161
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 3 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0160
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 3 September 2025
UKSC/2025/0159
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 3 September 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.