Visit JCPCAll cases
1577 Cases
UKSC/2026/0101
•
CRIME
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the trial judge’s decision to exclude certain material from the evidence presented to the jury breach the appellant’s right to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights?
Last updated: 22 September 2026
UKSC/2026/0143
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 22 September 2026
UKSC/2025/0138
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment given[2026] UKSC 34Case summary:Is section 128 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, which inserted sections 27A and 27B into the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997, compatible with articles 5, 7, and 14 (read with article 5), of the European Convention on Human Rights?
Last updated: 22 September 2026
UKSC/2026/0142
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 22 September 2026
UKSC/2026/0097
•
IMMIGRATION
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Does the Secretary of State for the Home Department have an implied statutory power to withdraw or vary a grant of indefinite leave to remain where, through an error by her officials, a letter granting such leave was sent to an asylum claimant instead of the letter granting limited leave to remain that she intended to be sent?
Last updated: 22 September 2026
UKSC/2025/0122
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment given[2026] UKSC 30Case summary:Does Regulation 5 of the Part-Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 (the “Part-Time Workers Regulations”) apply if a worker’s part-time status is an effective cause, but not the sole cause, of their less favourable treatment?
Last updated: 21 September 2026
UKSC/2026/0141
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2026/0140
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2024/0159
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 33Case summary:Does a car dealer who receives a commission from a lender for arranging finance in a tripartite transaction between customer, dealer, and lender in which a car is bought on credit owe a duty to the buyer of the car such as to enable that buyer (absent the requisite level of disclosure) to bring a claim against the lender for bribery or dishonest assistance, or under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the “CCA”)? The appeal requires the determination of the following sub-issues: (i) Does, or should, the law recognise a distinct tort of bribery? (ii) If such a tort is recognised, what is the nature of the duty or relationship (here between dealer and customer) that must exist in order for the tort to be engaged? (iii) Relatedly, what level of disclosure will prevent liability for bribery from arising? (iv) In Mr Johnson’s case, was the relationship between customer and lender “unfair” for the purposes of the CCA?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2024/0158
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 33Case summary:The appeal requires the determination of the following sub-issues: (i) Does, or should, the law recognise a distinct tort of bribery? (ii) If such a tort is recognised, what is the nature of the duty or relationship (here between dealer and customer) that must exist in order for the tort to be engaged? (iii) Relatedly, what level of disclosure will prevent liability for bribery from arising? (iv) In Mr Johnson’s case, was the relationship between customer and lender “unfair” for the purposes of the CCA?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2024/0157
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 33Case summary:Does a car dealer who receives a commission from a lender for arranging finance in a tripartite transaction between customer, dealer, and lender in which a car is bought on credit owe a duty to the buyer of the car such as to enable that buyer (absent the requisite level of disclosure) to bring a claim against the lender for bribery or dishonest assistance, or under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the “CCA”)? The appeal requires the determination of the following sub-issues: (i) Does, or should, the law recognise a distinct tort of bribery? (ii) If such a tort is recognised, what is the nature of the duty or relationship (here between dealer and customer) that must exist in order for the tort to be engaged? (iii) Relatedly, what level of disclosure will prevent liability for bribery from arising? (iv) In Mr Johnson’s case, was the relationship between customer and lender “unfair” for the purposes of the CCA?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2023/0177
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 48Case summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2023/0176
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 48Case summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2023/0175
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 48Case summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 September 2026
UKSC/2023/0174
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 48Case summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to overturn the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) that the collective proceedings should not be brought on an opt-out basis?
Linked casesLast updated: 18 September 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.