Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Vermilion Holdings Ltd (Respondent) (Scotland)
Case ID: 2022/0007
Was the right or opportunity for Mr Noble to acquire the 2007 Option (a) available by reason of his directorship of VHL (section 471(1) ITEPA); or (b) made available by Mr Noble’s employer (section 471(3) ITEPA), thereby subjecting it to income tax under Chapter 5, Part 7 of ITEPA?
In 2007, Vermilion Holdings Limited (“VHL”) granted Quest Advantage Limited (“Quest”), a corporate advisory and accounting company owned by Mr Noble (of which he was a director), an option to acquire 1.5% of VHL’s ordinary share capital (the “2007 Option”). Mr Noble was also appointed as a director of VHL from 16 March 2007, with a £4,167 monthly fee. The 2007 Option was novated to Mr Noble on 9 June 2016. Following a sale of VHL in November 2016, Mr Noble realised £636,238 from the exercise of the 2007 Option.
A dispute arose as to whether the gain was subject to income or capital gains tax. HMRC considered the 2007 Option an employment-related securities option under section 471 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (“ITEPA”), making Mr Noble liable for £285,148.76 (income tax) and £100,709.98 (National Insurance), by decisions dated 17 August 2017.
VHL appealed against these decisions to the First-Tier Tribunal, which allowed VHL’s appeal. By decision dated 27 May 2020, the Upper Tribunal allowed HMRC’s appeal. The Inner House allowed VHL’s appeal by decision dated 20 August 2021. HMRC now appeals to the Supreme Court.
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Vermilion Holdings Ltd
Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd–Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows, Lady Rose
Hearing start date
7 February 2023
Hearing finish date
7 February 2023
|7 February 2023||Morning session||Afternoon session|
Future Judgment Update
Please note that appeal in the matter of Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Vermilion Holdings Ltd (Respondent) (Scotland) has been heard by the Supreme Court and is currently awaiting judgment.
As soon as the judgment hand-down date is confirmed, it will be published on the Future judgments page of this website. As a very broad indication, judgments tend to follow between three to nine months after the conclusion of the appeal hearing, although in some cases it may be earlier than that. Information about judgment hand-downs is usually announced one week in advance. We are unable to give any indication of the likely hand-down date for judgments not listed on the Future judgments page.