Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Appellant) v BXB (Respondent)
Case ID: 2021/0089
Did the Court of Appeal wrongly find the appellant, part of the Jehovah's Witness organisation, to be vicariously liable for a rape committed by one of their elders?
In 1990, the respondent, Mrs B, was raped by an elder of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Mark Sewell, at his home, after they had been out evangelising together. Mr Sewell was convicted of raping Mrs B, and of indecently assaulting two other people, in 2014.
In 2017, Mrs B brought a claim for damages against the worldwide governing body of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Watchtower and Bible Tract Society of Pennsylvania, and the appellant, the Trustees of the Congregation. She claimed that they were responsible in law (or, “vicariously liable”) for the rape, because of the nature of their relationship with Mr Sewell and because of the connection between that relationship and the commission of the rape.
Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal found in Mrs B's favour. The appellant now appeals to the Supreme Court.
Trustees of Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Briggs, Lord Burrows, Lord Stephens
Hearing start date
13 February 2023
Hearing finish date
14 February 2023
|13 February 2023
|14 February 2023
26 April 2023
 UKSC 15
- Judgment (PDF)
- Press summary (HTML version)
- Judgment on The National Archives (HTML version)
- Judgment on BAILII (HTML version)
Please note this judgment was reuploaded on 2 May 2023 to corrected the misspelling of a name in paragraph 7.
|Watch Judgment summary
|26 April 2023
Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses (Appellant) v BXB (Respondent)
Case ID: UKSC 2021/0089
THE COURT ORDERED that no one shall publish or reveal the name or address of the Respondent or publish or reveal any information which would be likely to lead to the identification of the Respondent or of any member of her family in connection with these proceedings.