Skip to main content

Case details

Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General) (Appellant) v Privinvest Shipbuilding SAL (Holding) and others (Respondents)

Case ID: 2021/0085

Case summary

Issue

Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its approach to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 in finding that none of Mozambique’s claims were “matters” outside the scope of the relevant arbitration agreements.

Facts

This case concerns the “Tuna Bond” scandal in the Republic of Mozambique. Three corporate vehicles wholly owned by Mozambique (the SPVs) entered into supply contracts with Privinvest entities (the Contracts) for the development of Mozambique’s exclusive economic zone. The SPVs borrowed the purchase funds from various banks, over which borrowing Mozambique granted sovereign guarantees (the Guarantees). The Guarantees are governed by English law and provide for dispute resolution in the courts of England and Wales. Mozambique accuses the Privinvest companies and various individuals of paying significant bribes to Mozambique’s corrupt officials, exposing it to a potential liability of approximately USD 2bn under the Guarantees, and accordingly brought proceedings in England and Wales. The Contracts are governed by Swiss law and provide for dispute resolution by arbitration. Mozambique is not a signatory to the Contracts, but Privinvest contends that as a matter of Swiss law Mozambique is party to them and bound by the arbitration agreement within them. On that basis, Privinvest sought a stay of all Mozambique’s claims pursuant to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996. As a preliminary question, the issue arose as to whether Mozambique’s claims were “matters” “in respect of” the arbitration agreement under section 9. At first instance, the High Court held the claims were not. The Court of Appeal disagreed on appeal. Mozambique now seeks permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Judgment appealed

[2021] EWCA 329

Parties

Appellant(s)

Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General)

Respondent(s)

Privinvest Shipbuilding SAL (Holding) and others

Appeal

Justices

Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt, Lord Richards

Hearing start date

24 January 2023

Hearing finish date

25 January 2023

 
Watch hearing
24 January 2023 Morning session Afternoon session
25 January 2023 Morning session Afternoon session
 
 
 

Future Judgment Update

Please note that appeal in the matter of Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General) (Appellant) v Privinvest Shipbuilding SAL (Holding) and others (Respondents) has been heard by the Supreme Court and is currently awaiting judgment.

As soon as the judgment hand-down date is confirmed, it will be published on the Future judgments page of this website. As a very broad indication, judgments tend to follow between three to nine months after the conclusion of the appeal hearing, although in some cases it may be earlier than that. Information about judgment hand-downs is usually announced one week in advance. We are unable to give any indication of the likely hand-down date for judgments not listed on the Future judgments page.