DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) (Scotland)
Case ID: 2021/0020
(1) Were tax assessments made by HMRC in 2005 made out of time and therefore time barred?
(2) Do HMRC have an implied power to refuse to accept a sum claimed by a taxpayer by way of input tax?
DCM is a company primarily supplying glasses, but also providing eye tests and dispensing other optician services. The supply of frames and lenses for glasses is subject to VAT, however eye tests and services are not.
DCM has for a number of years challenged the amount of tax charged to it by HMRC. The present appeal concerns output tax, which is the tax which a taxable person must charge on non-exempt supplies of goods or services to customers. A range of issues have arisen, but this appeal concerns firstly whether assessments made in 2005 by HMRC of DCM’s tax liability were made out of time and were therefore time barred, and secondly whether HMRC have an implied power to refuse to accept a sum claimed by a taxpayer by way of input tax (i.e. the tax charged to them when purchasing goods or services).
The First-tier Tribunal held that HMRC’s 2005 assessments were not time-barred and that it could refuse a taxpayer’s input tax claim. The Upper Tribunal refused the appeal on the input tax issue but allowed it on the timebar issue. The Inner House overturned the Upper Tribunal’s decision on the timebar issue but upheld it on the input tax issue.
The Inner House of the Court of Session granted DCM permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.
DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen, Lord Stephens
Hearing start date
8 February 2021
Hearing finish date
8 February 2021
|8 Feb 2022||Morning session||Afternoon session|
Future Judgment Update
Please note that appeal in the matter of DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) (Scotland) has been heard by the Supreme Court and is currently awaiting judgment.
As soon as the judgment hand-down date is confirmed, it will be published on the Future judgments page of this website. As a very broad indication, judgments tend to follow between three to nine months after the conclusion of the appeal hearing, although in some cases it may be earlier than that. Information about judgment hand-downs is usually announced one week in advance. We are unable to give any indication of the likely hand-down date for judgments not listed on the Future judgments page.