R v Maughan (Northern Ireland)
Case ID: 2020/0103
(1) Whether the term "proceedings" should be confined to court proceedings in the context of considering reductions to defendants’ sentences when they plead guilty to a crime at an early stage.
(2) Whether such reductions to sentences may be reduced where the defendant is caught "red handed".
Owen Maughan and John Maughan were charged together and separately with a series of offences committed between 13 July 2015 and 25 July 2016. They pleaded guilty to these offences when they were formally charged on 14 September 2017. Both men had previous convictions and the pre-sentence report stated that they both presented a high likelihood of reoffending.
On 21 December 2017, both men were sentenced at Belfast Crown Court to imprisonment for fourteen years (seven years in custody and seven years on licence). Their sentences were somewhat reduced because they had pleaded guilty at an early stage. However, they were not afforded the maximum discount on their sentences because did not co-operate with the police on arrest and because, for certain of the offences, they were either caught "red handed" or the evidence against them was overwhelming.
Both appealed their sentences to the Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland) on the basis that they were manifestly excessive (Owen Maughan) and wrong in principle (John Maughan). The Court dismissed both appeals. Owen Maughan now appeals to the Supreme Court.
Owen John Maughan
Director of Public Prosecutions
Lord Hodge, Lord Hamblen, Lord Burrows, Sir Declan Morgan, Lord Lloyd–Jones
Hearing start date
27 January 2022
Hearing finish date
27 January 2022
|27 January 2022||Morning session||Afternoon session|
18 May 2022
 UKSC 13
- Judgment (PDF)
- Press summary (HTML version)
- Judgment on The National Archives (HTML version)
- Judgment on BAILII (HTML version)
|Watch Judgment summary|
|18 May 2022||Judgment summary|