Skip to main content

Case details

Pakistan International Airline Corporation (Respondent) v Times Travel (UK) Ltd (Appellant)

Case ID: UKSC 2019/0142

Case summary


What are the ingredients of economic duress? Can economic duress arise where lawful acts or threats are made by one party in support of a demand which that party genuinely believes it is entitled to make?


The Respondent, Pakistan International Airline Corporation ("PIAC"), had entered into a contract with the Appellant, Times Travel (UK) Ltd ("Times Travel"), pursuant to which Times Travel would act as ticketing agent to PIAC. Times Travel was a small family-owned travel agency. Its business was very largely dependent on its ability to sell PIAC's tickets. By 2012, a large number of PIAC's ticketing agents had either commenced or threatened proceedings to recover substantial sums they said PIAC owed to them by way of commission.

In September 2012, PIAC gave lawful notice of the termination of its existing agency contracts and offered Times Travel a new contract. The new contract contained a waiver by Times Travel of its claims for unpaid commission under the prior arrangements. Times Travel accepted and signed the new contract.

In 2014, Times Travel brought proceedings to recover unpaid commission and other payments which it said were due to it under the prior contractual arrangements. At first instance, the High Court held that Times Travel was entitled to avoid the contract with PIAC on the grounds of economic duress.

The Court of Appeal allowed PIAC's appeal. Times Travel now appeals to the Supreme Court.

Judgment appealed

[2019] EWCA Civ 828



Times Travel (UK) Ltd


Pakistan International Airline Corporation



Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, Lord Burrows.

Hearing start date

02 Nov 2020

Hearing finish date

03 Nov 2020

Watch hearing
02 November 2020 Morning session Afternoon session
03 November 2020 Morning session Afternoon session

Future Judgment Update

Please note that appeal in the matter of Pakistan International Airline Corporation (Respondent) v Times Travel (UK) Ltd (Appellant) has been heard by the Supreme Court and is currently awaiting judgment.

As soon as the judgment hand-down date is confirmed, it will be published on the Future judgments page of this website. As a very broad indication, judgments tend to follow between three to nine months after the conclusion of the appeal hearing, although in some cases it may be earlier than that. Information about judgment hand-downs is usually announced one week in advance. We are unable to give any indication of the likely hand-down date for judgments not listed on the Future judgments page.