Skip to main content

Case details

R (on the application of Haworth) (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Appellant)

Case ID: UKSC 2019/0124

Case summary

Issue

(1) Whether, for the purposes of the follower notice regime in the Finance Act 2014, "would" in s.205(3)(b) requires HMRC to consider that the principles or reasoning of a judicial ruling are more likely than not to result in the tax advantage being denied, or that the principles or reasoning will deny the advantage. (2) Whether in the present case HMRC had overstated the significance of Hughes LJ’s judgment in Smallwood v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] EWCA Civ 778, [2010] STC 2045. (3) Whether the CA was wrong to conclude that the identified misdirections justified quashing the follower and accelerated payment notices.

Facts

The case relates to a trust established by Mr Haworth for the benefit of himself and his family which held shares in a company. In order to avoid capital gains tax on the disposal of shares held by the trust, Mr Haworth was advised that the existing Jersey trustees should resign in favour of trustees resident in Mauritius. This arrangement, known as a ‘round-the-world’ scheme, was designed to take advantage of a double taxation treaty between the United Kingdom and Mauritius. Mr Haworth and his advisers duly enacted the scheme in 2000.
In 2016, HMRC sent Mr Haworth a follower notice, which renders the recipient liable to a penalty if he does not take steps to counteract or surrender a tax advantage, and an accelerated payment notice, which requires up-front payment of the disputed tax. Mr Haworth initiated judicial review proceedings of HMRC’s decision to issue these notices. At first instance, Mr Haworth was unsuccessful. However, the Court of Appeal allowed Mr Haworth’s appeal and quashed the notices.

Judgment appealed

[2019] EWCA Civ 747

Parties

Appellant(s)

Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Respondent(s)

R (on the application of Haworth)

Appeal

Justices

Lord Briggs, Lady Arden, Lord Leggatt, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose

Hearing start date

21 Apr 2021

Hearing finish date

21 Apr 2021

Watch hearing
21 Apr 2021 Morning session Afternoon session
 
 

Future Judgment Update

Please note that appeal in the matter of R (on the application of Haworth) (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Appellant) has been heard by the Supreme Court and is currently awaiting judgment.

As soon as the judgment hand-down date is confirmed, it will be published on the Future judgments page of this website. As a very broad indication, judgments tend to follow between three to nine months after the conclusion of the appeal hearing, although in some cases it may be earlier than that. Information about judgment hand-downs is usually announced one week in advance. We are unable to give any indication of the likely hand-down date for judgments not listed on the Future judgments page.