Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc (Respondent) v Kymab Ltd (Appellant)
Case ID: UKSC 2018/0131
Case summary
Issue(s)
Kymab Ltd ("Kymab") alleges that the relevant patents are invalid for insufficiency because they did not enable the ordinary skilled person to work the claimed invention across the breadth of the claims.
Facts
The patents are concerned with biotechnology, and in particular the production of human antibodies using transgenic mice. By the priority date, the potential uses of antibodies (also known as immunoglobulins) for treating human disease had been well recognised, and a number of different antibodies had been developed and approved for such use. The patents describe a technique for making such antibodies.
Regeneron appealed the decision of Henry Carr J that European Patent (UK) No 1 360 287 and its divisional European Patent (UK) No 2 264 163 ("the 287 patent" and "the 163 patent" respectively) are invalid. Kymab cross-appealed against the judge's finding that its various strains of transgenic mice would infringe claims 5 and 6 of the 287 patent and claim 1 of the 163 patent if those patents had not been invalid.
Regeneron’s appeal was allowed by the Court of Appeal. Kymab’s cross-appeal was dismissed.
Judgment appealed
Parties
Appellant(s)
Kymab Ltd
Respondent(s)
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc
Appeal
Justices
Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales
Hearing start date
11 Feb 2020
Hearing finish date
12 Feb 2020
| Watch hearing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2020 | Morning session | Afternoon session |
| 12 Feb 2020 | Morning session | Afternoon session |
Judgment details
Judgment date
24 Jun 2020
Neutral citation
[2020] UKSC 27
| Watch Judgment summary | |
|---|---|
| 24 Jun 2020 | Judgment summary |