In the matter of D (A Child)
The Court is expected to make a Reporting Restrictions Order in this case to protect the identity of those involved. These restrictions apply to members of the public using Twitter or other social media channels in the same way as they do to professional journalists. If in doubt, consult the Communications Team via the reception desk.
Case ID: UKSC 2018/0064
Whether the confinement of D, a young person aged 16, who lacked capacity or competence to make decisions about his residence and care, amounted to a deprivation of his liberty for the purposes of art.5 ECHR, in circumstances where his parents were consenting to the confinement.
D was born on 23 April 1999. He has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Asperger’s Syndrome, Tourette’s Syndrome and a mild learning disability. In March 2012 D was informally admitted to a psychiatric hospital for assessment and treatment, with his parents’ consent and it was proposed to move him to a residential placement in which he would be under continuous supervision and control. On his 16th birthday the respondent council applied for a declaration that D was not deprived of his liberty on the basis that his parents were still able to consent to his confinement in exercise of their parental responsibility. It was common ground that D lacked capacity to make decisions about his residence and care.
D (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)
Birmingham City Council
- Equality and Human Rights Commission
- Secretary of State for Education
- Secretary of State for Justice
Lady Hale, Lord Carnwath, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden
Hearing start date
03 Oct 2018
Hearing finish date
04 Oct 2018
|03 Oct 2018||Morning session||Afternoon session|
|04 Oct 2018||Morning session|