Case details

HM Inspector of Health and Safety (Appellant) v Chevron North Sea Limited (Respondent) (Scotland)

Case ID: UKSC 2016/0166

Case summary

Issue(s)

Whether the Employment Tribunal hearing an appeal under section 24 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 by a person on whom an improvement notice or prohibition notice has been served is entitled to take into account evidence which was not known and could not reasonably have been known to the inspector at the time he issued the notice.

Facts

Following an inspection of the respondent’s offshore installation in the North Sea on 23 April 2013, the appellant considered that corrosion on the stairways and gratings leading to the helipad was such as to render them unsafe. The respondent, in agreement with the appellant, started remedial work that day. The appellant served a Prohibition Notice on the respondent on that evening. It identified the risk of serious personal injury to persons falling through the affected areas because they were in a weakened state due to corrosion and ordered the respondent to cease using the stairways until they were rendered safe. Laboratory testing later carried out on behalf of the respondent indicated that the corrosion had not in fact rendered the areas unsafe

.

The respondent appealed against the Prohibition Notice to the Employment Tribunal under section 24 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 ("the 1974 Act"). The Tribunal considered that it ought to take the subsequent testing results into account in assessing whether the Prohibition Notice should have been served, as any evidence which shed light on the situation as it had been at the time was relevant to the question of whether the Prohibition Notice should have been served. The Tribunal cancelled the Prohibition Notice, concluding that it would be unjust for a notice to remain in place when it had transpired that its factual basis was erroneous, regardless of whether the information could have been known to the inspector at the time.

The Inner House dismissed the appeal, holding that an appeal on the facts under section 24 required the Tribunal to have regard to any competent information available at the time of its hearing on appeal in order to determine whether an actual risk existed at the time the Prohibition Notice was issued.

Judgment appealed

[2016] CSIH 29

Parties

Appellant(s)

HM Inspector of Health and Safety

Respondent(s)

Chevron North Sea Limited

Appeal

Justices

Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black

Hearing start date

14 Dec 2017

Hearing finish date

14 Dec 2017

Watch hearing
14 Dec 2017 Morning session