SXH (Appellant) v Crown Prosecution Service (Respondent)
The Court is expected to make a Reporting Restrictions Order in this case to protect the identity of those involved. These restrictions apply to members of the public using Twitter or other social media channels in the same way as they do to professional journalists. If in doubt, consult the Communications Team via the reception desk.
Case ID: UKSC 2014/0148
- Whether the appellant's entry into the UK as an asylum seeker and the decision to prosecute her for entering with false travel documentation engaged art.8 ECHR.
- What is the appropriate threshold for engaging art.8?
- Whether the decision to prosecute was disproportionate.
The appellant fled her home country of Somalia in late 2008 as a result of extreme sexual and physical violence she had suffered there. She travelled to Yemen and then to the United Kingdom using a false travel document, arriving on 27 December 2009, and applied for asylum once she had entered the country. It is not in dispute that it was not possible for her to obtain proper documentation in Somalia. When it became clear that she had entered the country using a false travel document she was detained and charged with possessing a false document under s.25(1) of the Identity Cards Act 2006. The CPS offered no evidence at a mention hearing in on 11 June 2010. The appellant was granted asylum and released from custody.
Crown Prosecution Service
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes, Lord Toulson
Hearing start date
19 Jul 2016
Hearing finish date
19 Jul 2016
|19 Jul 2016||Morning session||Afternoon session|