Visit JCPCAll cases
1514 Cases
UKSC/2022/0077
•
CRIME
Judgment givenCase summary:Is clause 5(2)(a) of the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill outside the legislative competence of the Northern Ireland Assembly because it disproportionately interferes with the rights of persons who wish to express their opposition to the provision of abortion treatment services in Northern Ireland?
Last updated: 8 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0080
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 8 June 2026
UKSC/2021/0019
•
PUBLIC LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:Can the Secretary of State direct the Office of Communications (Ofcom) not to introduce regulations exempting certain wireless telegraphy equipment from a licensing requirement on national security grounds?
Last updated: 8 June 2026
UKSC/2022/0098
•
PUBLIC LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:(1) Is the question referred by the Lord Advocate a “devolution issue”? If not, it cannot be the subject of a reference under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6, which would mean that the Court does not have jurisdiction to decide it. (2) Even if the question referred by the Lord Advocate is a devolution issue, should the Court decline to determine the reference as a matter of its inherent discretion? (3) Does the provision of the proposed Scottish Independence Referendum Bill that provides that the question to be asked in a referendum would be “Should Scotland be an independent country?” relate to reserved matters? In particular, does it relate to: (i) the Union of the Kingdoms of Scotland and England; and/or (ii) the Parliament of the United Kingdom?
Last updated: 8 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0034
•
TORT
Permission to Appeal grantedCase summary:Can the tort of unlawful means conspiracy be founded on: 1. a civil wrong that is not independently actionable by the claimant? 2. a breach of contract to which the claimant is not a party? 3. a breach of foreign law? 4. conduct that the defendant did not know to be unlawful?
Linked casesPrimary Case
Primary Case
Last updated: 5 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0079
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 5 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0078
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 5 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0077
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 5 June 2026
UKSC/2021/0028
•
PUBLIC LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:The key issue is whether the Respondent’s charging policy for community care services is discriminatory.
Last updated: 4 June 2026
UKSC/2025/0178
•
COMMERCIAL
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Does the obligation on the seller to pay “due compensation” in Clause 14 of the SALEFORM 2012 standard form contract entitle the buyer to loss of bargain compensation?
Last updated: 4 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0056
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Permission to Appeal grantedCase summary:In 2025 the government introduced VAT on private school fees. The appellants are religious private schools, their pupils, and their pupils’ parents. Was the introduction of VAT on private school fees compatible with the appellants’ right to equal treatment under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to property under Article 1 of Protocol 1 of the Convention, and to education under Article 2 of Protocol 2 of the Convention?
Linked casesLast updated: 4 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0045
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal grantedCase summary:In 2025 the government introduced VAT on private school fees. The appellants are religious private schools, their pupils, and their pupils’ parents. Was the introduction of VAT on private school fees compatible with the appellants’ right to equal treatment under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to property under Article 1 of Protocol 1 of the Convention, and to education under Article 2 of Protocol 2 of the Convention?
Linked casesLast updated: 4 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0041
•
TORT
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Did Mr Fox’s social media posts cause or were likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour within the meaning of section 1(1) the Defamation Act 2013?
Last updated: 4 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0037
•
TORT
Permission to Appeal grantedCase summary:Can the tort of unlawful means conspiracy be founded on: 1. a civil wrong that is not independently actionable by the claimant? 2. a breach of contract to which the claimant is not a party? 3. a breach of foreign law? 4. conduct that the defendant did not know to be unlawful?
Linked casesRelated case
Last updated: 4 June 2026
UKSC/2026/0035
•
TORT
Permission to Appeal grantedCase summary:Can the tort of unlawful means conspiracy be founded on: 1. a civil wrong that is not independently actionable by the claimant? 2. a breach of contract to which the claimant is not a party? 3. a breach of foreign law? 4. conduct that the defendant did not know to be unlawful?
Linked casesPrimary Case
Last updated: 4 June 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.