All cases

Filters

1415 Cases


  • UKSC/2025/0169

    Case summary:

    What is the correct approach to the treatment of creditors who would be “out of the money” (would not receive a payout) in the “relevant alternative” to a restructuring plan sanctioned under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006?

    Last updated: 21 November 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0079

    Case summary:

    (1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)

    Linked cases

    Last updated: 21 November 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0059

    Case summary:

    (1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)?

    Linked cases

    Last updated: 21 November 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0184

    Case summary:

    Last updated: 21 November 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0076

    Case summary:

    (1) When is a former director of a company liable as an intermeddler? (2) Is the original transfer of Shares to the Company subject to an unpaid vendor’s lien? (3) Is the quantum of equitable compensation for misappropriated property to be ascertained by reference to the date of misappropriation or the date of judgment? (4) Which party bears the burden for proving that the claimant has or has not suffered loss on a counterfactual scenario?

    Last updated: 20 November 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0075

    Case summary:

    (1) When is a former director of a company liable as an intermeddler? (2) Is the original transfer of Shares to the Company subject to an unpaid vendor’s lien? (3) Is the quantum of equitable compensation for misappropriated property to be ascertained by reference to the date of misappropriation or the date of judgment? (4) Which party bears the burden for proving that the claimant has or has not suffered loss on a counterfactual scenario?

    Linked cases

    Last updated: 20 November 2025


  • UKSC/2018/0007

    Judgment given
    Case summary:

    Whether, on an application for planning permission for a wind turbine proposed to be undertaken by a community benefit society, the distribution to the local community of a community benefit fund derived from the operation of the turbine is, in the circumstances of the case, a material planning consideration which the council could lawfully take into account when considering whether to grant planning permission.

    Last updated: 20 November 2025


  • UKSC/2023/0152

    Judgment given
    Case summary:

    This appeal concerns a claim for bereavement support payment (“BSP”). BSP is a non-means-tested contributory benefit, which provides financial help to people whose spouse or partner has died. BSP will only be paid to the surviving spouse or partner if the conditions specified in the Pensions Act 2014 (the “2014 Act”) are met. These include the “contribution condition” described in sections 30 and 31, which requires that for at least one tax year during the deceased’s working life, he or she paid national insurance contributions. The two main issues raised by this appeal are: (i) the treatment due by appellate courts in one UK jurisdiction of decisions from another UK jurisdiction regarding the similar or materially identical legislation; (ii) whether the contribution condition unlawfully discriminates against Mr Jwanczuk under article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the “Convention”) read together with article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention .

    Last updated: 20 November 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0093

    Judgment given
    Case summary:

    (i) Is the child element of universal credit (“UC”) a family benefit under article 3(1)(j) of the Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems; and (ii) Is it necessary for the Supreme Court to refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) under article 158 of the Withdrawal Agreement?

    Last updated: 19 November 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0095

    Judgment given
    Case summary:

    Do religious education and collective worship provided in a school in Northern Ireland breach the rights of a child, and the child’s parents, under Article 2 of the First Protocol (“A2P1”) to the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) read with Article 9 ECHR?

    Last updated: 19 November 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0190


    Case summary:

    Last updated: 19 November 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0189


    Case summary:

    Last updated: 19 November 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0005

    Case summary:

    Was the Court of Appeal correct to hold that (A) whether the claims are time-barred has not been finally determined in the Prudential test case, and should be determined in the present proceedings by applying the law as it stands now (“Limitation Issue”); (B) GREA is not entitled to a claim in restitution for payment of unlawful advance corporation tax utilised against lawful tax or repaid before the issue of its claim (“Set-off Issue”); and (C) by 1 April 2010, the Appellants had not pleaded a claim in restitution for the recovery of unlawful tax paid as a result of their inability to offset unused double taxation relief credit (“Pleading Issue”)?

    Last updated: 19 November 2025


  • UKSC/2024/0135

    Case summary:

    Does the power of the Magistrates’ Court to ‘vary or rescind’ a sentence or order under Article 158A of the Magistrates’ Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981 include the power to make a new sentence or other order independent of and additional to a previous sentence or order of that court?

    Last updated: 19 November 2025


  • UKSC/2025/0043

    Case summary:

    (1) Was it procedurally unfair for the Secretary of State for the Home Department to deprive Mr Kolicaj of his British citizenship without affording him an opportunity to make representations? (2) Did the Court of Appeal act in excess of jurisdiction by quashing the deprivation order made against Mr Kolicaj?

    Last updated: 17 November 2025


Sign up for case email alerts

Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.