Visit JCPCAll cases
1341 Cases
UKSC/2024/0087
•
CRIME
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether as a matter of law upon the proper construction of the LIBOR and EURIBOR definitions: (a) if a LIBOR or EURIBOR submission is influenced by trading advantage, it is for that reason not a genuine or honest answer to the question posed by the definitions; and (b) the submission must be an assessment of the single cheapest rate at which the panel bank, or a prime bank, respectively, could borrow at the time of submission, rather than a selection from within a range of borrowing rates.
Linked casesLast updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0088
•
CRIME
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether as a matter of law upon the proper construction of the LIBOR and EURIBOR definitions: (a) if a LIBOR or EURIBOR submission is influenced by trading advantage, it is for that reason not a genuine or honest answer to the question posed by the definitions; and (b) the submission must be an assessment of the single cheapest rate at which the panel bank, or a prime bank, respectively, could borrow at the time of submission, rather than a selection from within a range of borrowing rates.
Linked casesLast updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2023/0142
•
TORT
Judgment givenCase summary:(1) Whether a dishonest assistant can be liable in relation to a breach of a constructive trust of secret profits. (2) The extent to which gains from one breach of fiduciary duty can be set off against losses from another connected breach.
Last updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2023/0178
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:Where information falls within multiple qualified exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“FOIA”), does section 2(2)(b) of FOIA require the public interest in maintaining each of those exemptions to be aggregated (“the cumulative approach”), or does it require the public interest in maintaining each exemption to be considered separately (“the independent approach”)?
Last updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0119
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment scheduledCase summary:Whether – under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 – a private hire vehicle operator who accepts a booking is required to contract (as principal) with the relevant customer, to fulfil that booking.
Last updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0055
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment scheduledCase summary:Should the Secretary of State for Transport’s (“SST”) decision to detain a yacht in London under the UK’s Russian sanctions regime be set aside on (i) human rights, or (ii) public law, grounds?
Linked casesLast updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0045
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment scheduledCase summary:(i) Did the Court of Appeal adopt the wrong approach to determining whether the Appellant’s designation was a proportionate interference with his rights under Article 8 and Article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? (ii) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to conclude that maintaining the Appellant’s designation was not a breach of his rights under Article 8 and Article 1, Protocol 1 of the ECHR?
Linked casesLast updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0089
•
FAMILY
Judgment givenCase summary:When does non-matrimonial property become matrimonial property in the context of financial remedy proceedings, and how should the sharing principle be applied to such property?
Last updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0131
•
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Does the statutory restriction on patenting a program for a “program for a computer…as such” apply to artificial neural networks (“ANNs”)? If so, does it prevent the Appellant’s application from being patented?
Last updated: 23 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0125
•
NEGLIGENCE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 22 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0124
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Linked casesRelated case
Last updated: 22 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0114
•
COMMERCIAL
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Did the terms of an agreement between the Appellant and a third-party (the “Appointed Representative Agreement” or “ARA”), which prohibited the third-party from dealing with Retail Clients, also limit the Appellant’s liability for acts and omissions from the third-party conducting business with Retail Clients?
Last updated: 22 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0123
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 21 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0122
•
EMPLOYMENT
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 21 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0024
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:The principal issue concerns the validity of a civil penalty notice issued by the Secretary of State for the Home Department under section 15 of the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. In view of the requirement under s.15(6)(a) that a notice must “state why the Secretary of State thinks the employer is liable to the penalty”, is the penalty notice invalid if it does not identify which of the grounds in s.15(1) applies (i.e. by specifying the circumstances in which a person subject to immigration control has no right to work)?
Last updated: 18 July 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.