Visit JCPCAll cases
1597 Cases
UKSC/2025/0091
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:In summary, did the Court of Appeal err by: (1) Concluding that the ministerial advice was deficient, in a way which failed to apply the correct standard of Wednesbury irrationality; and then not permitting the Appellant to reconsider the decision in light of full and fresh advice from officials addressing the matters identified by the Court of Appeal. (2) Assuming the role of decision-maker in this case and overstepping its constitutional boundaries. (3) Failing to properly consider what is characterised as the ‘floodgates argument’. (4) Taking into account its recent decision in Dillon, despite that decision being subject of an ongoing appeal to the Supreme Court, and the relevant part of the decision being a section 4 Human Rights Act (“HRA”) declaration that did not change the law. (5) Ignoring the scheme for remedial action under the HRA, and or the Appellant’s appeal rights in relation to Dillon. (6) Concluding, in both its consideration of the substantive appeal and in relation to remedy, that this case was an exceptional one that could be distinguished from other similar Troubles related cases. (7) Concluding that the choice faced by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (“SOSNI”), when considering the appropriate investigative mechanism to discharge the Article 2 European Convention of Human Rights (“ECHR”) investigative obligation, was a “binary one” meaning that the only lawful option available was to order a Public Inquiry. (8) Then ordering the mandatory holding of a public inquiry.
Last updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0162
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0097
•
IMMIGRATION
Permission to Appeal grantedCase summary:Does the Secretary of State for the Home Department have an implied statutory power to withdraw or vary a grant of indefinite leave to remain where, through an error by her officials, a letter granting such leave was sent to an asylum claimant instead of the letter granting limited leave to remain that she intended to be sent?
Last updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0034
•
EU LAW
Judgment scheduled[2026] UKSC 36Case summary:Can an arbitral tribunal award equitable compensation against a State for breach of an equitable obligation to arbitrate? Did the Court of Appeal exceed the statutory limits of an appeal under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996?
Linked casesLast updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0161
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0160
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0159
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 27 October 2026
UKSC/2023/0127
•
EXTRADITION
Judgment given[2025] UKSC 3Case summary:Was the High Court's approach to whether the appellant's alleged conduct constituted an "extradition offence" correct, having regard to the requirements of section 137(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003?
Last updated: 26 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0028
•
TAX
Judgment given[2026] UKSC 18Case summary:Are certain members of BlueCrest LLP to be treated as employees for tax purposes?
Last updated: 26 October 2026
UKSC/2019/0209
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 21Case summary:Whether a worker’s right to paid annual leave is accumulated according to the working pattern of the worker and/or is pro-rated.
Last updated: 24 October 2026
UKSC/2020/0066
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 1Case summary:Where a company incorporated by leaseholders in a block of flats acquires the right to manage the block under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 ("the Act"), and the leaseholders also enjoy rights over the estate in which the block is situated, does the company only acquire the right to manage the block itself, or does it also acquire the right to manage the rest of the estate?
Last updated: 24 October 2026
UKSC/2020/0084
•
CRIME
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 2Case summary:(1) Does section 13(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 create a strict liability offence? (2) If so, is section 13(1) compatible with article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights?
Linked casesLast updated: 24 October 2026
UKSC/2020/0076
•
CRIME
Judgment given[2022] UKSC 2Case summary:(1) Does section 13(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 create a strict liability offence? (2) If so, is section 13(1) compatible with Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights
Linked casesLegal issue
Last updated: 24 October 2026
UKSC/2025/0194
•
TORT
Awaiting judgmentCase summary:Is the CPS advocate immune from suit in respect of anything said or done in the course of a bail hearing, including the disclosure of a vulnerable person’s confidential address to their abusive ex-partner? Does that immunity extend to the police, who included the Appellant’s address in the file for the CPS? If the common law immunity does exist and apply, does it bar claims under the Human Rights Act 1998 and Data Protection Act 2018? Did the Court of Appeal err in reinstating the summary disposal of the Appellant’s Human Rights Act claims?
Last updated: 23 October 2026
UKSC/2026/0158
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 22 October 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.