Visit JCPCAll cases
1337 Cases
UKSC/2025/0024
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:The principal issue concerns the validity of a civil penalty notice issued by the Secretary of State for the Home Department under section 15 of the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006. In view of the requirement under s.15(6)(a) that a notice must “state why the Secretary of State thinks the employer is liable to the penalty”, is the penalty notice invalid if it does not identify which of the grounds in s.15(1) applies (i.e. by specifying the circumstances in which a person subject to immigration control has no right to work)?
Last updated: 18 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0121
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 18 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0120
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 18 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0107
•
TORT
Case summary:Linked casesLegal Issue
Last updated: 18 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0119
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 18 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0131
•
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Hearing listedCase summary:Does the statutory restriction on patenting a program for a “program for a computer…as such” apply to artificial neural networks (“ANNs”)? If so, does it prevent the Appellant’s application from being patented?
Last updated: 18 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0114
•
COMMERCIAL
Hearing listedCase summary:Did the terms of an agreement between the Appellant and a third-party (the “Appointed Representative Agreement” or “ARA”), which prohibited the third-party from dealing with Retail Clients, also limit the Appellant’s liability for acts and omissions from the third-party conducting business with Retail Clients?
Last updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0013/A
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Hearing listedCase summary:Linked casesLast updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0066
•
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:The Administrative Court and Court of Appeal addressed the question of whether the local planning authority (“LPA”) is required to take into account the potential impact of electromagnetic fields on medical implants when determining a prior approval application for a new telecommunications mast. The Appellant raises the issue of whether prior approval is a definitive legal obligation for all new ground-based telecommunication masts, and whether relevant provisions of the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) should have been applied by the LPA when determining the prior approval application.
Last updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0118
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0088
•
CRIME
Judgment scheduledCase summary:(1) Is a LIBOR or EURIBOR submission automatically dishonest if it is influenced by a trading advantage? (2) Must a LIBOR or EURIBOR submission be of the single cheapest rate at which the panel or prime bank could borrow at the time of the submissions or can it be a rate selected from within a range of potential borrowing rates?
Linked casesLegal issue
Last updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0087
•
CRIME
Judgment scheduledCase summary:(1) Is a LIBOR or EURIBOR submission automatically dishonest if it is influenced by a trading advantage? (2) Must a LIBOR or EURIBOR submission be of the single cheapest rate at which the panel or prime bank could borrow at the time of the submissions or can it be a rate selected from within a range of potential borrowing rates?
Linked casesLegal issue
Last updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2023/0142
•
TORT
Judgment scheduledCase summary:(1) Whether a dishonest assistant can be liable in relation to a breach of a constructive trust of secret profits. (2) The extent to which gains from one breach of fiduciary duty can be set off against losses from another connected breach.
Last updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2023/0178
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment scheduledCase summary:Where information falls within multiple qualified exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“FOIA”), does section 2(2)(b) of FOIA require the public interest in maintaining each of those exemptions to be aggregated (“the cumulative approach”), or does it require the public interest in maintaining each exemption to be considered separately (“the independent approach”)?
Last updated: 17 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0117
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 17 July 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.