Permission to Appeal - July 2021
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| R (on the application of Connell) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) UKSC 2020/0162 Neutral Citation Number [2018] EWCA Civ 1329 |
Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Refused 8 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law and the appeal is out of time. |
| IGE USA Investments Ltd and others (Respondents) v
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant)
UKSC 2021/0081 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 534 |
Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Granted 8 July 2021 |
N/A |
| Peifer (Appellant) v
Sullivan Upper School (Respondent) (Northern Ireland)
UKSC 2020/0033 Neutral Citation Number [2019] NICA 51 | Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Refused 8 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| R (on the application of WA (Palestinian Territories)) (Appellant) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0034 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 12 |
Lord Hodge Lady Arden Lord Stephens |
Refused 12 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| In the matter of P (AP)
UKSC 2021/0116 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 512 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 13 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal. |
| In the matter of T (AP) UKSC 2021/0094 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 448 In the matter of B-B (a child) UKSC 2021/0100 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 448 In the matter of H (a child) (AP) UKSC 2021/0127 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 448 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 13 July 2021 Refused 14 July 2021 Refused 14 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. No challenge is made on these appeals to the Court of Appeal's general approach to patterns of coercive behaviour and to the means by which such abuse can affect a child. Procedural guidance is for the Family Division and the Court of Appeal; the Supreme Court will be very slow to intervene in the absence of a demonstrable error of law. The wider issues raised by the interveners are not amenable to resolution in these appeals. |
| Loveridge (Appellant) v
Loveridge and others (Respondents) UKSC 2020/0159 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1104 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 13 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| R (on the application of Drexler, by her father and litigation friend, Stefan Drexler) (AP) (Appellant) v
Leicestershire County Council (Respondent)
UKSC 2020/0163 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 502 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 13 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Holt (Appellant) v
Holley & Steer Solicitors (Respondent)
UKSC 2020/0146 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 851 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 13 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Adesotu (AP) (Appellant) v
London Borough of Lewisham (Respondent)
UKSC 2020/0127 Neutral Citation Number [2019] EWCA Civ 1405 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 13 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law which ought to be considered at this time. |
| Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v
JS (Uganda) (AP) (Appellant)
UKSC 2020/0105 Neutral Citation Number [2019] EWCA Civ 1670 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 13 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law on the cessation issue, which is determinative of this appeal. |
| Stanford International Bank td (in liquidation) (Appellant) v
HSBC Bank PLC (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0103 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 535 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Granted 13 July 2021 |
N/A |
| Aria Technology Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) UKSC 2020/0093 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 182 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 13 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Emambux (Appellant) v
Innisfree Housing Association Limited (Respondent)
UKSC 2020/0043 Neutral Citation Number [2019] EWCA Civ 2048 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 14 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Rattan (Respondent) v
Kuwad (Appellant)
UKSC 2021/0040 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 1 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 14 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| The Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association - Forces Help and another (Respondents) v
Allgemeines Krankenhaus Viersen GmbH (Appellant)
UKSC 2020/0154 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 926 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lady Arden Lord Sales |
Granted 26 July 2021 |
N/A |
| R (on the application of Nettleship) (AP) (Appellant) v
NHS South Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2020/0045 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 46 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lady Arden Lord Sales |
Refused 26 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Walker (Appellant) v
Co–operative Group Ltd and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2020/0167 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1075 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lady Arden Lord Sales |
Refused 26 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd (in special liquidation) and another (Appellants) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent)
UKSC 2020/0170 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1128 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lady Arden Lord Sales |
Refused 26 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| In the matter of F (A Child) UKSC 2021/0148 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 1018 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 27 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Canara Bank (a Government of India undertaking) (Respondent) v
Dansingani and another (Appellants)
UKSC 2021/0126 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 714 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 28 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Bosworth and another (Appellants) v
Alta Trading UK Ltd and others (Respondents) UKSC 2021/0132 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 687 |
Lord Reed Lord Hodge Lord Lloyd-Jones |
Refused 29 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Murray (Appellant) v
Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland)
UKSC 2021/0122 Neutral Citation Number [2021] HCJ 2 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt |
Refused 29 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| R (on the application of FTH) (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) UKSC 2021/0033 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 494 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lady Arden Lord Sales |
Refused 29 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| R (on the application of Cotter (a child, by her mother and litigation friend Natasha Cotter)) (AP) (Appellant) v
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0046 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1037 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lady Arden Lord Sales |
Refused 29 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. In addition we consider that the point has become academic. |
| Nwabueze (Appellant) v
University of Law Ltd and others (Respondents)
UKSC 2021/0003 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1526 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lady Arden Lord Sales |
Refused 29 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| In the matter of an application by Marina Lennon for Judicial Review (AP) (Northern Ireland)
UKSC 2020/0142 Neutral Citation Number [2020] 11200 |
Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Refused 2 August 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Blake (AP) (Appellant) v
Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland)
UKSC 2021/0073 Neutral Citation Number HCA 2020/251 XC |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt |
Refused 4 August 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| In the matter of A (Children) (AP)
UKSC 2021/0151 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 939 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 6 August 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| R (on the application of FWF and another) (AP) (Appellants) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0142 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 88 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 6 August 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |