Permission to Appeal - February 2022
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| R (on the application of Richards) (AP) (Appellant) v
Environment Agency and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2022/0014 Neutral Citation Number [2022] EWCA Civ 26 |
Lord Kitchen Lord Sales Lord Stephens |
Refused 1 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law in the context of this case. |
| In the matter of an application by JR83 for Judicial Review No 2 (AP) (Northern Ireland)
UKSC 2021/0221 No Neutral Citation Number |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Amil (Appellant) v
Lafferty (Respondent) (Scotlad)
UKSC 2021/0217 Neutral Citation Number [2021] CSIH 41 Van Overwaele (Appellant) v Lafferty (Respondent) (Scotland) UKSC 2021/0224 Neutral Citation Number [2021] CSIH 41 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the applications do not raise an arguable point of law. |
| McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) (Appellant) v
Glasgow City Council (Respondent) (Scotland)
UKSC 2021/0028 Neutral Citation Number [2020] CSIH 51 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Granted 15 February 2022 |
|
| In the matter of an application by Kielan Allen for Judicial Review (AP) (Northern Ireland)
UKSC 2021/0032 Neutral Citation Number [2020] NICA 40 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Paul Newman New Homes Ltd (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0039 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 15 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal. |
| R (on the application of Monkhill Ltd) (Appellant) v
Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0041 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 74 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal. |
| Gladman Developments Ltd (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and others (Respondents)
UKSC 2021/0058 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 104 |
Lord Hodge Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal. |
| Flother (Appellant) v
Etihad Airways PJSC (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0024 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1707 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| R (on the application of RJG) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2017/0117 Neutral Citation Number [2016] EWCA Civ 1042 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. This permission to appeal was adjourned pending the outcome of KO (Nigeria), but that decision does not make it appropriate to give permission to appeal in this case. |
| Taj (Appellant) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0043 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 19 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| R (on the application of Badmus and others) (AP) (Appellants) v
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0048 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 657 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Buttar Construction Ltd (Appellant) v
Arshdeep (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0197 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 1408 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Bojarinovs (Appellant) v
General Prosecutors Office, Latvia (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0053 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWHC 374 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| O'Neill (Respondent) v
Holland (Appellant)
UKSC 2021/0037 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1583 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) (Respondent) v
Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd (Appellant)
UKSC 2021/0027 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1521 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Leggatt |
Granted in part 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused on Ground 2 (amending Defence). |
| Libyan Investment Authority and others (Respondents) v
King and others (Appellants)
UKSC 2021/0021 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1690 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Leggatt |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Kuwait Oil Company (K.S.C.) (Appellant) v
Al-Tarkait (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0025 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1752 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Leggatt |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Appellant) v
BTI 2014 LLC (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0035 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 9 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Leggatt |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| R (on the application of Day) (Appellant) v Shropshire Council (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0031 Neutral Citation Number [2020] EWCA Civ 1751 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Leggatt |
Granted 15 February 2022 |
|
| Rossiter (Appellant) v
Partington (As Executor) (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0218 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 1564 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Leggatt |
Refused 15 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0047 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 91 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Granted 23 February 2022 |
|
| R (on the application of Maguire) (AP) (Appellant) v
Her Majesty's Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2021/0038 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Granted 23 February 2022 |
|
| R (on the application of CXF, by his litigation friend MB) (Appellant) v
Central Bedfordshire Council (Respondent)
UKSC 2021/0026 Neutral Citation Number [2018] EWCA Civ 2852 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Refused 23 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd and another (Respondents) v
Motorola Solutions Inc and another (Appellants)
UKSC 2021/0036 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 11 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Refused 23 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise a point which ought to be considered at this time. Although there may be an arguable point in relation to the test of “a good arguable case”, there is no arguable point in relation to impropriety, and an appeal would therefore be bound to fail. |
| R (on the application of Asda Stores Ltd) (Appellant) v
Leeds City Council and another (Respondents)
UKSC 2021/0054 Neutral Citation Number [2021] EWCA Civ 32 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Refused 23 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Prior and another (AP) (Appellants) v
The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland)
UKSC 2021/0030 Neutral Citation Number [2020] CSIH 36 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Refused 1 March 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |