Permission to Appeal - August 2023
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
|
UKSC 2023/0059
Tindall and another (Appellants) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police (Respondent) [2022] EWCA Civ 25 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Granted 24 August 2023 |
An extension of time is granted. Permission to appeal is granted on both grounds. |
|
UKSC 2023/0062
Rukhadze and others (Appellants) v Recovery Partners GP Limited and another (Respondents) [2023] EWCA Civ 305 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Granted 6 September 2023 |
An extension of time is granted. Permission to appeal is granted. |
|
UKSC 2023/0065
R3 (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2023] EWCA Civ 169 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 24 August 2023 |
Permission is refused on the ground that the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law under Grounds 2 and 3, and Ground 1, even if it were arguable, is accordingly academic. |
|
UKSC 2023/0063
XL Insurance Company S.E. and others (Appellants) v Quadra Commodities S.A. (Respondent) [2023] EWCA CIV 432 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Granted 5 September 2023 |
Permission to appeal is granted. |
|
UKSC 2023/0077
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v Public and Commercial Services Union (Appellant) [2023] EWCA Civ 551 And UKSC 2023/0076 Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v Public and Commercial Services Union (Appellant) [2023] EWCA Civ 551 And UKSC 2023/0075 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Respondent) v Public and Commercial Services Union (Appellant) [2023] EWCA Civ 551 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Granted 24 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is granted on all grounds. |
|
UKSC 2023/0090
C G Fry & Son Ltd (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Levelling up, Housing and Communities and another (Respondents) [2023] EWHC 1622 |
Lord Reed Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 24 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused on the ground that the case is not suitable for a leapfrog appeal. |
|
UKSC 2023/0055
London Luton Hotel BPRA Property Fund LLP (Appellant) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) [2023] EWCA Civ 362 |
Lord Hodge Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 25 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused as Ground 1 is not arguable, and the appeal does not raise a point of law of general public importance. |
|
UKSC 2023/0061
Grier (Appellant) v C (Respondent) (Scotland) 2022 CSIH 57 |
Lord Hodge Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 25 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law |
|
UKSC 2023/0072 Guidi (Appellant) v Promontoria (Chestnut) Ltd (Respondent) (Scotland) [2023] CSIH 4 |
Lord Hodge Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 25 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law |
| UKSC 2023/0070 McFarlane (Appellant) v His Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) |
Lord Hodge Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 25 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused as the Court has no jurisdiction as there is no compatibility issue. |
| UKSC 2023/0066 Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others (Respondents) v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others (Appellants) No 2 [2023] EWCA Civ 438 |
Lord Hodge Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 25 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise a point of law of general public importance. |
| UKSC 2023/0057
R (on the application of T and others) (AP) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) [2023] EWCA Civ 24 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens |
Refused 29 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law |
| UKSC 2023/0067
Floreat Investment Management Ltd (Appellant) v Churchill and others (Respondents) [2023] EWCA Civ 440 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens |
Refused 29 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance. |
| UKSC 2023/0069 Metro Inns Ltd (Appellant) v Department of Finance, Land and Property Services (Respondent) (Northern Ireland) |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens |
Refused 29 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance. |
| UKSC 2023/0073
UniCredit Bank A.G. (Appellant) v Euronav N.V. (Respondent) [2023] EWCA Civ 471 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens |
Refused 29 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance. |
| UKSC 2023/0082
R (Respondent) v Phair (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2022] NICA 66 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Leggatt Lord Stephens |
Refused 29 August 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused as the point of law is not one which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court. |
| UKSC 2023/0060
R (on the application of Isah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] EWCA Civ 268 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Richards |
Refused 14 September 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| UKSC 2023/0064
AHGR Ltd (Appellant) v Kane-Laverack and another (Respondents) [2023] EWCA Civ 428 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Richards |
Refused 14 September 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused as the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance. |
| UKSC 2023/0071
McClean and others (Appellants) v Thornhill KC (Respondent) [2023] EWCA Civ 466 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Richards |
Refused 14 September 2023 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the point of law on duty of care is not arguable and the other points raise no point of law of general public importance. |